18 Mar
2005
18 Mar
'05
6:38 p.m.
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:16:24 -0500, Miro Jurisic <macdev@meeroh.org> wrote:
I believe that the question of why basic_string is not a suitable Unicode abstraction has been answered adequately in this thread, but to summarize: numerous basic_string methods would allow the client to violate invariants set by the Unicode standard.
The client would not be using the basic_string directly to manipulate the unicode character string, although he would have access to the basic_string. If the client chooses to shoot themselves in the foot, they can. But any operation on the string as a string of characters would be done through another interface. Rakshasa