Re: [boost] Another patch for long long in gcc -std=c++98

Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:

...

The following patch is another attempt to get long long support working, in a manner acceptable with Boost, even when -std=c++98 and -pedantic are specified. In particular, GCC supports long long in all modes, but __extension__ is required to quiet errors and warnings.

I think all disccused issues were resolved. What is the status on this?

I'll try and commit some patches this week, if no-one objects I'll use: namespace boost{ __extension__ typedef long long long_long_type; __extension__ typedef unsigned long long ulong_long_type; } Inside the config system (since all the headers include that anyway). The replace [unsigned] long long with the fully qualified names (::boost::long_long_type etc). John.