The code I am using was originally developed by Christopher Diggins. His code allows for use of boost.timer or the high_resolution_timer. I am currently using the high_resolution timer. THANK YOU for the suggestion of using the microsec_time_clock.hpp. I did not know that existed, do you know how does this compare to the high_resolution timer? I need to stick to a base release version of boost for production reasons, do you think this other timer will work inside 1.32? Thank you very much for your thoughts, I would not have noticed the microsec if you had not pointed it out to me.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Caleb Epstein Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 8:32 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] Re: high_resolution_timer \ timer feature requestsforBoost.Timer
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:42:16 -0700, Brian Braatz <brianb@rmtg.com> wrote:
But the Profile LOG (like a trace of what happened) looks like this DEPTH NAME TIME 0 FuncA 2 Seconds 1 FuncB 1 Second
Does that answer your question, or am I missing something?
Just a subtle point, but the boost::timer class returns CPU time used not elapsed wall-clock time and would return results of ~0.0 for a function that just sleep'd for a second or two.
If what you're looking for is a high-resolution clock, try <boost/date_time/microsec_time_clock.hpp> (at least in the latest CVS). If you want performance or profiling information, use boost::timer.
-- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost