26 Apr
2012
26 Apr
'12
9:08 p.m.
Mathias Gaunard wrote:
On 26/04/12 22:08, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
Doesn't the same thing happen in boost::optional and boost::variant?
Yes, their code is arguably ill-formed, but I'm sure some people claim otherwise.
No, it's not. Provide the standard text that, in your opinion, makes them ill-formed.