
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
Thanks for the correction. I hope to get my hands onto this soon, so I'll try it out asap.
No problem. I also encountered problems with the program_option and filesystem (in both the tools and lib wave build) locations as already noted. Once these had been fixed, BBv2 complains about libs/wave/build not being able to locate libboost_wave-....lib. The problem here is to do with auto-linking. Thus, BOOST_WAVE_SOURCE is not being defined. This fixed, I got an error about tools/wave/build not being able to locate boost_wave.lib which was fixed by using link=static on the build command line. I now have a wave.exe executable :). NOTE: it might be useful to define an install command: install bin : wave ; to make the wave.exe file easier to find (instead of having to navigate multiple directory levels)! That done, I have successfully build wave on: * gcc-3.3 * msvc-7.1 * msvc-8.0 - albeit with a lot of deprecated warnings relating to sprintf, etc And get errors when compiling for: * msvc-7.0 - when building flex_string.hpp: 'std::reverse_iterator' - too many template arguments. Note that this can be fixed by using boost::reverse_iterator (which saves the reverse_iterator detection logic): #include <boost/iterator/reverse_iterator.hpp> // ... typedef boost::reverse_iterator< iterator > reverse_iterator; typedef boost::reverse_iterator< const_iterator > const_reverse_iterator; Note that I haven't tried building with this fix, although it should work fine. (It may need the <rtti>off fix for 7.1, though). Note that I have not tested on msvc-6.5 because it is unlikely that wave will compile on it. * cw-9.2 - there are a host of errors when building wave using Metrowerks CodeWarrior. These relate to: * undefined identifier 'time_t' (src/cpplexer/re2clex/cpp.re.cpp) * undefined identifiers memcpy, free, etc. * const size_t s = e - b; (boost/wave/util/flex_string.hpp) implicit 'int' is no longer supported in C++ I think that these relate to missing #include and using directives. E.g. using std::size_t; I will look into these errors. Regards, Reece