8 Jul
2006
8 Jul
'06
3:53 p.m.
Peter Dimov wrote:
The only difference between this test and the "non-tricky" one is the presence of those two lines. The test is intentionally pedantic.
It didn't occur to me to look at the non-tricky test. :-)
Why did you decide to duplicate all non-tricky portions in the tricky test as well? We are running both.
Well originally they weren't supposed to be tricky: there was supposed to be one test that "concept checked" each TR1 section, when I found that Boost didn't support a few of the features, I just commented out those parts that Boost didn't support and made these the "non-tricky" tests, and the "complete" unmolested versions became the "tricky" tests. John.