"David Abrahams" wrote
"Andy Little" <andy@servocomm.freeserve.co.uk> writes:
Your criticism mainly concerned the C++ Concepts section of the documentation for PQS. What might help is some examples of what you consider good C++ Concept documentation.
The C++ standard does a pretty decent job. There's also the SGI STL website. There's also the Boost Graph library. The "new iterator concepts" document in the iterator library docs does pretty well. And you can always start at http://www.boost.org/more/generic_programming.html#concept.
I have had a look at these sources and I will look at them in more detail, however they seem to represent only Concepts with runtime requirements. Many of the concepts used in PQS library have only compile time requirements. The only example of documentation for this type of Concept that I know of is MPL.( I assume you see MPL as a good example of compile time only concept documentation). PQS uses both forms of Concept. Is there any means or language convention to distinguish the two forms? My current intention is to put the compile-time requirement Concepts under a separate section from the runtime requirement Concepts. regards Andy little