7 Dec
2009
7 Dec
'09
9:48 a.m.
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:37 +0100, Christophe Henry wrote:
Hi Michael,
What do you think about this instead?
CurrentState() + cool_event()[Guard()]/(action()) = DestState()
I think it more closely matches the UML syntax.
The first issue is only my worry that users would be confused (eUML already being quite a change). I'd be interested to hear from others about it.
I like this suggestion - but really - it is not a huge issue. I assumed that the only reason guard was last in the transition table syntax was because it was optional. I don't personally find it confusing if euml picks a different order.