19 Nov
2009
19 Nov
'09
9:45 p.m.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Hartmut Kaiser <hartmut.kaiser@gmail.com> wrote:
Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
I suggest, for the case of competing libraries, that the contributors are supposed to review the opponent's library but to refrain from voting.
+1 (I was already thinking the same.)
If a competitor votes, the review manager should ignore it, of course.
Why should the review manager ignore a YES vote of an author of a competing library?
Only because if that became the rule, it somewhat implies that NOT VOTING == a NO vote. Or at least suggests as much.
Regards Hartmut
------------------- Meet me at BoostCon http://boostcon.com
Tony --------- hope to see you there