Chris Yuen wrote:
Robert,
As you can see from the code example, I want to be able to deserialize a list of these "commands" from the base pointer, because I actually have hundreds of these polymorphic commands and they need to each have a virtual "Execute()" method so that they know how to apply themselve to an "Actioner." (Instead of using a giant switch-case in the Actioner to identify each command) I figured it's better than using a magic number, opcode approach
it is better, and the serialization library supports and even encourages this. Just serialize and de-serialize through a base class pointer.
I was under the impression that if I want to deserialize using a base pointer, I must also serialize via the base pointer, is that correct?
correct.
So I guess the below won't work with the original deserialization code?
{ boost::scoped_ptr<Strings> s; const Strings * s = new Strings("Hello", "World")); oa << s; .... // same for all the other stuff // s deleted as it goes out of scope }
This would work. What won't work is { boost::scoped_ptr<Strings> s; const Strings * s = new Strings("Hello", "World")); const * x = s; oa << s; delete s; oa << x; ... } Your making this way too hard, just look at the examples and tests to see that all you have to do is serialize though a base class pointer. When the (base class) pointer is deserialized, an object of the most derived class is created automagically. The serialization library takes care of keep track of the true (i.e. most derived type). Robert Ramey