John Torjo <john.groups <at> torjo.com> writes:
Jamie Allsop wrote:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to everyone participating in the review of proposed logging
library.
I do believe this is one of the "must have" components to be included in boost libraries suite. Anyone who is interrested in sharing views on the subjust are still welcome (specifically I might be interrested in comparizon with other popular existing solutions). Nevertheless official tally is closed as of now and "jury is secluded for deliberations" ;). I'll try to compile the results within reasonable time frame.
There was earlier talk of extending the review period. I have still to submit my review but will not be able to do so until the weekend. Having gone to the effort of spending quite a few hours over the past week to try and use the logging library I'd like an opportunity to voice my opinion on it and have it taken into account.
Yes, I would agree. Also, Jurko Gospodnetic has said he'd do a review later this week. But it's all up to the review manager.
Guys, I explicitly asked for anyone interrested to extend the time to voice their opinion. Beleive it or not I am not yet able to read your mind ;). I'll confirm with Review wizard, But let's assume the extension is granted till the end of the week. Gennadiy