Is that a big deal? I dont think so
...
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019, 3:58 PM Ion GaztaƱaga via Boost
On 13/09/2019 14:43, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:28 AM
wrote: Why not use a static_vector<char> ?
static_vector is missing all of the string-oriented algorithms.
There is a cost associated with maintaining the null termination of strings
Yeah, that's easily fixed. We can add the function fixed_capacity_string::c_str() which will put the terminator on and return a pointer, this way the mutating operations do not need to always leave the string in a null terminated state.
But then c_str() would not be "const noexcept".
Best,
Ion
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost