"Jens Seidel" <jensseidel@users.sf.net> wrote in message news:20071220161635.GA515@imkf-pc073.imkf.tu-freiberg.de...
To show you that I really read (at least up to UTF) the documenation I mention a few errors in it:
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/faq.html: * "provide provide"
fixed
* "link with libunit_test_framework.lib" that's platform specific!!!
Why?
* "The reasons for this error is that in your implementation you should specify second argument of init_unit_test_suite exactly as in a specification, i.e.: char* []." s/as in a specification/as in the specification/ (I first read e.g. instead of i.e. which confused me even more, maybe you should avoid "i.e.".)
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/open-issues.html * "Finish update for CLA support" What is CLA?
I removed abbriviation
* Remove two or three full stops in the enumeration
What do you mean?
* "Better Unicode support (reports and log in wostream)" Sorry, I don't see any relation of wostream and Unicode! You mean UTF16 encoding? UTF8 should work fine with both ostream and wostream, right?
I 'll be more equipped to to answer this once I start doing this.
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/execution-monitor.html * "Also The Execution Monitor" s/The/the/
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/execution-monitor/reference.html * Page misses a "next" link to http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/boost/execution_exception.html
This is being reworked.
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/prg-exec-monitor/impl.html * Link to libs/test/execution_monitor.cpp does not work
should work now
* "wraps a several system headers" s/a//
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/minimal.html * "other then include boost/test/minimal.hpp" s/include/including/ * "This approach is are similar" (belongs to folded text for example 4) s/are//
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/tutorials/intro-in-testing.html * "why testing worth the effort" s/testing/testing is/
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/tutorials/new-year-resolution.html * s/BOOST_AUTO_EST_CASE/BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE/ * "As a result my test suite became to look like this:" Wrong example!!! data_access_test() was expected
fixed
http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/utf/user-guide/initialization.html * "Alternatively in you can employ" s/in//
fixed
* "with the static library or single-header variants of the UTF requires the specific function specification." Check this! s/specification/signature/, s/specific/original/?
No, namely specification: both signature and function name. And it's quite specific. I agree it doesn't sound right though. Thanks for your comments. Gennadiy