Re: [boost] is_nan

25 Jul 2006

      John Maddock wrote:
...
Johan Råde wrote:
...
So it would make sense to have the functions
is_finite()
   is_normal()
   is_subnormal()
is_infinity()
   is_plus_infinity()
   is_minus_infinity()
is_nan()
Do we really want to use gratuitously different names from those in C99:
isfinite
isnorm
isinf
isnan
?
Probably not. I was just ignorant about C99, and tried to put together 
Boost style names. Lets stick with the C99 names then.

When will you submit your implementations of isnan etc to Boost?

--Johan Råde