Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here

Marcel Raad writes:

Thanks a lot! I switched all my local tests to the develop version the last couple of days and encountered no problems in the default configuration. The new documentation is great too.

If I define BOOST_TEST_NO_OLD_TOOLS, I get a lot of compilation errors because of missing operator<< for the classes used with BOOST_TEST(a == b). Is that expected?

If a and b do not have operator << overloaded then yes. You can use BOOST_TEST((a==b)) or can use BOOST_TEST_DONT_PRINT_LOG_VALUE(type) Gennadiy