21 Dec
2005
21 Dec
'05
9:15 a.m.
Frank Laub wrote:
Is there a particular reason why this compiler complains about the conversion whereas the others are fine with it? Would you consider making this change to support this compiler?
I'm happy to make a change that supports more compilers. Thanks for trying it out on Borland. I'll have an update soon.
Actually, this is not about supporting more compilers - this about fixing a bug. Putting 'return false' there is a bug, plain and simple, and 'return optional()' is the right thing to do, whether we care about more compilers support or not...