Daniel Wallin <dalwan01@student.umu.se> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Yeah, sure, I'm interested. I still hope whoever's doing this won't overlook free functions like swap ;-).
I checked it in to the sandbox.
boost/result_check.hpp boost/libs/utility/test/result_check_test.cpp
It's missing a simple way to somehow specialize for fundamental types..
I don't understand why you'd want that. But maybe I don't understand what "that" is.
check_swap<> can be written:
BOOST_RESULT_CHECK(2, swap, swap, swap(_1, _2)) arity ---^ ^ ^ ^ trait name --------' | | overload name --------------' | expression --------------------'
-- Daniel Wallin
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com