Re: [boost] [cmake] Minimum viable cmakeification for Boost

Niall Douglas wrote:

...

Even if so, you still need to be able to answer the question "how do I link to Asio in such a way so that its dependency System is statically/dynamically linked?"

I'm saying that ASIO header only users almost certainly will also want header only Boost.System.

I don't think so (although now that it has been fixed to use Winapi instead of , maybe). But even if true, users of static library A that uses Asio will not necessarily want a header-only Boost.System, which means that static library A has to have a way to link to Asio "statically".