Re: [boost] active objects implementation request for comments

AMDG Jason Turner <lefticus <at> gmail.com> writes:

<snip>

I agree, in principal, and it was my original intention. However, a design goal was to make sure that any existing class could work with active_object and your above example does not allow for a specific constructor to be called. I guess, however, now that I think about it, if the user needs to call the not-default constructor he can store a pointer.

You can either have N template constructors or use in_place_factory

<snip> I also considered something along the lines of:

ao->(&TestClass::getInt);

What is your thought on that?

Illegal in C++. In Christ, Steven Watanabe