Re: [boost] Pimpl Again?

On May 31, 2016 5:41:54 PM EDT, Emil Dotchevski wrote:

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Chris Glover wrote:

...

You're making a very compelling argument. Actually strong enough that it makes me want the uniform call syntax when I was previously on the fence about that feature.

I'm generally not in favor of adding stuff to C++. What's the upside in this case? To be able to say p.do_something() instead of do_something(p), because the latter offends Java programmers? :)

The upside is not writing some calls one way and others the other way on the same object, and having to remember which is which. ___ Rob (Sent from my portable computation engine)