7 Nov
2009
7 Nov
'09
4:49 a.m.
on Wed Nov 04 2009, "John Maddock" <john-AT-johnmaddock.co.uk> wrote:
That won't work well for a test-runner will it? On the first warning, the build will fail. It would be better to have a report of all warnings that must be addressed.
The issue is that the warnings are otherwise too easy to ignore. I fear that unless they are made into errors for some test runners - and those runners are part of the "required" set - then nothing will get done :-(
Agreed. -- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com