Thanks :-) I'm not sure, but portable may not mean "without dependencies of any other code whatsoever". There's also Boost.Python, Boost.MPI, Boost.Filesystem, Boost.Asio, etc., which all depend on some external API. you are welcome! maybe portable doesn't mean external-dependance-free but at least a
Interesting. Have you looked at MTL4? i swear it looks familiar to me but i don't actually remeber i'll use all that references as a reference (oops! pun again) while
on 11.08.2009 at 22:11 Rutger ter Borg wrote : library must not depend on other entities rather than standard facilities or OS i prefer bundles like e.g. qt: once you got it you build it and use and nothing else matters i don't like when lib needs something else to use it rather a particular lib can deliver a feature of extesibility or integration with 3rd-party software e.g. doxygen which is able to draw it's own ugly class diagrams but allows you to use external graphviz tool seamlessly to generate state of the art pics polishing my own lib -- Pavel