Re: [boost] [rpc/marshal] prototype rpc / marshal libraryusing asio and serialization (and futures in the future?)

I second this. I've written a light rpc framework and a futures-like thing was the main point of interaction. Where is your futures library anyway? -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org on behalf of Braddock Gaskill Sent: Tue 5/1/2007 4:16 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] [rpc/marshal] prototype rpc / marshal libraryusing asio and serialization (and futures in the future?) On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:48:31 -0700, Stjepan Rajko wrote:

I guess the consensus is that there is use for both sync and async aspects, and both should be

I personally would suggest looking at how futures can make the async/sync elements easier.