2 Nov
2009
2 Nov
'09
11:32 p.m.
This looks like a good idea, but how does it compare to the thin wrappers for NTL and mpfr/gmp in boost/math/bindings ? Unfortunately for many applications, we really need a complete std libm implementation: the Boost.Math binding get close to that, how about these?
Yep I remember now that you had talked about that already last time we mentioned our work, I completely forgot to look at Boost.Math bindings since then. However I don't find any real documentation about what it is exactly (rationale + use case(s)). If the purpose is the same as our work, there would be no problem to migrate our work into your (add CLN for instance). Bruno