
27 Oct
2006
27 Oct
'06
1:57 a.m.
On Oct 26, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:
Thanks, I'll try this tomorrow. Later today, I mean.
I'm an old man. I can't deal with your hours. :-)
BTW... why do you count the upgradable among the readers? It seems a bit simpler not to include it in the reader count; it already has a bit all for itself.
I found it simpler to include the upgradable in the reader count. It has been a year or two since I made that decision so, you know, times change, sometimes we get smarter (sometimes not). At the time: an upgradable lock is a reader. It doesn't become a writer until someone asks it to, at which time it decrements the reader count and waits at gate 2. YMMV. -Howard