on 03.05.2010 at 22:07 Stewart, Robert wrote :
DE wrote:
i agree with almost all you've just said however chad not only stated that his cow is faster (a pun intended) but also provided numbers (test results -- read "the proof") so that's you who must prove the cow is slower than whatsoever or misapplied, not chad
I've already noted that his application of move semantics was being reviewed. (I think it was Jeffrey Hellrung who was looking into it.) I also noted that we'd like to understand why. Those points remain to be fulfilled, but it doesn't make our approach faulty.
my point is if you want to "understand why" then why don't you look at the sources instead of making guesses? that will answer your question(s) and make the discussion more constructive -- Pavel P.S. if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message please point it out