Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: <boost-announce@lists.boost.org>; <boost-users@lists.boost.org> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 4:20 PM Subject: [boost] [Review][Ratio] Boost.Ratio has been ACCEPTED
Hi,
I am pleased to announce that Boost.Ratio has been ACCEPTED into Boost.
A few changes were requested by the reviewers, which I will list below. I know that Vicente has already started working on some of these. These changes should be addressed before the library appears in a Boost release.
* Some of the macros had names with RATIO_RATIO in. These should be changed to just RATIO
* The ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply and ratio_divide templates should derive from the resulting ratio type as well as providing the nested ::type member, in order to closely emulate the template alias facility from C++0x
* The typos in the documentation should be fixed, and the documentation reviewed for correctness and clarity (though several of the reviewers made positive comments on the quality of the documentation).
* The library needs more tests under the Boost Software License.
* All references to names from the boost namespace should be qualified with boost:: to avoid potential name clashes and ambiguity with names from the global namespace.
* Sections commented out with #if 0 should be removed
* The extensions beyond the facilities required by the C++0x draft should be able to be enabled or disabled through use of a configuration macro.
* References to the tests, examples and documentation from within the code should be checked for correctness.
I've taken in account the requested changes. Paul Bristol is reviewing now the documentation, but he will prefer to fix some issues on trunk. I want to know if I can move to trunk now. Thanks, Vicente