At 12:14 2006-06-15, John Maddock wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
a. I don't think you're actually agreeing with me. Maybe s/carefully/seriously/?
b. Normally our default is not the same as the compiler's default when the compiler's default is nonconformant, as it is in this case.
I missed (well forgot actually) that the compiler was non-comforming
"in that mode" in which "mode" ?? , I guess it's not quite non-conforming enough to cause problems for
most people, although I agree that the performance issue is a very real one. The suggestion to provide a Boost.Build option for this sounds like the best approach though? Anyone want to provide a patch?
John.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com The five most dangerous words in the English language: "There oughta be a law"