k-oli@gmx.de writes:
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 16:26:05 schrieb vicente.botet:
Sorry for the noise, I belive that you were using the 'Just Solution Software' implementation.
Yes - I'm using future library from Anthony Williams (scheduled for boost peer review). Because the interface seams to become part of C++0x I modifed boost.threadpool in order to use it.
Note that the (Boost-licensed) implementation you've used is based on N2561, which is an older proposal than the one that was finally accepted.
I hope Anthony will provide its implementation to boost. The question is (as you already asked) what happens with Braddocks future library - is a peer review still required? Should Anthonies future lib added to boost by default?
The future libraries (mine + Braddock's) are due for Boost review in January. Anthony -- Anthony Williams Author of C++ Concurrency in Action | http://www.manning.com/williams Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd, Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK