16 Jun
2006
16 Jun
'06
11:35 a.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
I missed (well forgot actually) that the compiler was non-comforming in that mode, I guess it's not quite non-conforming enough to cause problems for most people, although I agree that the performance issue is a very real one. The suggestion to provide a Boost.Build option for this sounds like the best approach though? Anyone want to provide a patch?
What interface would you consider appropriate? Right now
bjam ... define=_SECURE_SCL=0 ...
Oh, if it's that easy then I'm happy and I'll just shut up :-) John.