Tom Brinkman wrote:
Mini-reviews would be very useful. I’m shur that each boost developer/user could contribute a few small, useful algorithms. It would be a great way to increase the level of participation by developers who want to contribute but don’t have the time to write a complete library.
I think that's a nice idea. But as David Abrahams said (about keeping the overall quality high), perhaps on these mini-reviews we should be reviewing only a small pack of algorithms at once. The algorithsm could be categorized by the thing they're trying to solve (a pack would be constituted by all algorithms fitting this category). [note: in Wiki, they seem to already by categorized] Since developers are busy in general, I think such a monthly mini-review would suffice (by-monthly is too much for me). Best, John -- John Torjo Freelancer -- john@torjo.com Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal -- "Win32 GUI Generics" -- generics & GUI do mix, after all -- http://www.torjo.com/win32gui/ Professional Logging Solution for FREE -- http://www.torjo.com/code/logging.zip (logging - C++) -- http://www.torjo.com/logview/ (viewing/filtering - Win32) -- http://www.torjo.com/logbreak/ (debugging - Win32) (source code available)