26 Mar
2010
26 Mar
'10
10:30 a.m.
On 26 March 2010 08:11, David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
Untangling (and minimizing) intra-library dependencies is certainly doable—the untangling part has already been done (http://gitorious.org/boost)—but you proposed something more radical… and probably impossible when you consider the pimpl/header-only requirement. A pimpl-based type traits library?
I don't think it's a good idea to divide boost up based on the current directory structure. We really should sort out the structure of boost before splitting it up, not after. Daniel