Brad Higgins <bhiggins <at> arbor.net> writes:
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:56 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
We all know about the performance hit, however that style is mandated by the standard (which thankfully is still in flux, hopefully they will remove the need for it to return the iterator).
I researched it further yesterday, and found the thread about the identical issue with unordered_map (I need to read my boost mail more often!). I'm going to implement a void-return style version of erase, like the workaround in unordered_map, and use that until this issue is resolved officially.
Hi Brad, I'm keeping track of the aforementioned thread as well as the discussions within the C++ committee. As soon as some consensus is reached I'll adapt Boost.MultiIndex accordingly. Thank you for using Boost.MultiIndex, Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo