Hi there, I noticed this project and got really excited. Hopefully it won't meet the same fate as the coroutine library. Some comments: Pros: 1.) Impressive performance. Did you write some assembly for each platform to avoid having to swap out the signal masks and floating point context? 2.) Stack guard. This would be a huge win for me. Safety is always good. 3.) C++0x idioms. I'm glad to see movable being used. Cons: 1.) Void * argument passing. Perhaps there's some limitation that requires this. If so, then I'd be curious to read about it in the Rationale section. Even then, some syntactical sugar to hide the static cast may not be bad. 2.) Function pointers only? It looks like the library only accepts function pointers, not bound functions, functors, or lambdas. I suspect this is related to the fact that makecontext() accepts raw function pointers. Nevertheless, I've come to expect the ability to pass an arbitrary "callable" argument to boost libraries. If this is unreasonable, then I'd be curious to learn why in the Rationale section. Great work! Again, I'm really excited about the potential here, Taylor -----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Kowalke Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 5:20 AM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: [boost] [context] ready Hi, https://github.com/olk/boost.context.git contains the new version of boost.context (docu at http://ok73.ok.funpic.de/boost/libs/context/doc/html/index.html) Any comments are welcome - in the meantime I'm awaiting Giovanni's OK for the mini-review. regards, Oliver _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost