John Torjo wrote:
I don't think construction is tricky. I think knowing whether I'm still constructed - that's the problem.
You can never test for "still constructed" using data that is part of the possibly destructed object - all you get is undefined behavior. You don't need the test if you can live with never destroying the object.
The scoped log stuff doesn't seem to have been updated to support levels yet - in fact I'm not sure if it currently works?
It does work, and it does support levels: BOOST_SCOPEDLOG and BOOST_SCOPEDLOGL
It was just the problem fixed by Andreas confusing me.
You're right. What comes to mind, is to have an extra parameter: bool add_even_if_name_exists.
So, if passing 'false', if "display" already exists, it's not added. If passing 'true', "display" is added even if it exists.
That works, but I think the interface reflects a design choice (mixing naming/registering the appender and connecting it) that should be reconsidered. Regards Darryl. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.10/73 - Release Date: 15/08/2005