18 Jun
2020
18 Jun
'20
11:10 a.m.
Alexander Grund wrote:
I've seen other SIMD UTF-8 conversions around and they basically all focus on ASCII converting as much as possible and fallback to one-by-one decoding once a non-ascii is found
The question is, do they do that because they've determined that that gives the best performance (for some benchmark input), or have they not tried to do more with the SIMD code? Regards, Phil.