Paul A Bristow wrote:
Indeed - but I didn't see the MS BUILD number - needed to distinguish between 8.0 beta 1, 2, 2.5 ... and final(s). Microsoft have ideas on version numbering which seem dotty to me, but they have ...
There's a comment about the number of digits for each part of the version number: "Some more thinking on the version number... I think it's relatively safe to set it at 2/2/5. That covers MSVC which has the large patch numbers. And covers CW, and others, which are up to and past 10 for the major number." The intent, as it's not explicit since the MSVC define is not there yet, is that the patch number for MSVC will be the build number. So in your previous example the version would be 8.0.50215. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org