25 Jul
2006
25 Jul
'06
11:09 p.m.
Dave Dribin <dave-ml@dribin.org> writes:
[snip]
Well, if I haven't convinced you by this point, hopefully at you'll at least consider using a #define to disable constructors for those people that *do* find a real-world use for such classes in unions.
Perhaps the solution is to support both use cases by having a separate type for each of the two use cases. -- Jeremy Maitin-Shepard