31 May
2007
31 May
'07
11:20 a.m.
On May 31, 2007, at 4:32 AM, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
Additionally, one could also set up a completely different repository for the sandbox, to make logs/history less cluttered. Has that been considered?
It was. We (I?) decided to put it into the same Subversion repository, so that it would be easy to keep all of the sandbox history for a library when it is accepted into Boost. With SourceForge, this was a real pain: we had to either beg SF staff to move over the CVS history, or we had to just re-import and lose easy access to that history. Subversion dumpfiles can make this a little easier, and the Subversion server is under our control now, but it still requires user intervention. - Doug