Hi, I dislike the idea because it bloadens the the binaries (with boost the object files become extermly large in size). If possible I'd suggest to provide an argument to bjam enabling header-only boost.thread or not. Oliver Am Montag 11 Mai 2009 21:59:50 schrieb JOAQUIN M. LOPEZ MUÑOZ:
Hi,
A few weeks ago we had a discussion about the convenience of making part of Boost.Threads, namely mutexes and locks, header-only. Some (including Anthony Williams) supported the idea, others disliked it:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2009/04/150524.php
What the final decision on this issue is? If positive (i.e. favoring the change), can it be expected to be done for Boost 1.40?
As a remainder, I've created an associated trac ticket:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2964
Thank you,
Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost