
17 Nov
2009
17 Nov
'09
10:12 p.m.
2009/11/17 Vladimir Batov <vladimir.batov@wrsa.com.au>:
Given the situation, would that be unrealistic to ask the respective authors to come up with a joint proposal?
As they undoubtedly took different approaches, I think trying to ask them to pick one would be unreasonable. The review process ought to do a much better job with each evangelizing their preferred approach. It would be great if both authors collaborated on whatever combination or variation is eventually accepted, but I don't think we can force that, nor should we try to.