29 Feb
2004
29 Feb
'04
5:31 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
Daniel Frey <d.frey@gmx.de> writes:
I don't like the name of the function, as std_min doesn't hint me about the ADL-nature of the call. Would adl_std_min be too much typing? Or propbably just adl_min, as it's quite common to use std::min if ADL doesn't find a better match. My $.02.
Looks to me as though boost::min_ is the best name for this thing.
I tried to engage people in a discussion of these issues before making 1000+ edit to correct this problem. Now, everybody want to change it. :-P This would be a simple search/replace, so I don't mind. Can we all agree on boost::min_? I don't want to have to change it again. -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com