
16 Aug
2011
16 Aug
'11
12:50 a.m.
On Aug 15, 2011, at 2:56 PM, greened@obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote:
Is there any reason a variadic MPL would have a different interface?
Yep. There are plenty of cases in MPL where variadic interfaces would be useful, sequence construction being a primary one. It is a royal pain to convert a C++11 variadic type list into an MPL vector, for example.
Well that seems like just a compiler bug. I was wondering how else we could expect C++11 to improve the interface of MPL, beyond sequence <-> variadic conversions. But I can be patient and see it when it's ready. :-) Cheers, Gordon