On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Vinnie Falco
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Rene Rivera
wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Vinnie Falco
wrote: Why did the formatting for Boost.Asio documentation change from 1.61 to ... What you should do is to:
a) define the boostdoc alias as empty. b) define the boostrelease alias to build the asio standalone docs.
Wait uhh...what do you mean? Are you saying that I should make that change locally? I was hoping we could fix the official documentation for everyone. I don't build the asio docs for myself, I use the one at boost.org
Sorry misunderstood your question slightly.. The ASIO author has to decide is the documentation they want for the release is to be the integrated one (as it is now in 1.63) or the standalone one (as it was in 1.61). When I made the doc building changes for CI I "guessed" as to the intent of the authors. In the case of ASOI I guess that they wanted the integrated docs as they have existing explicit build targets for them. Which meant that somehow the layout changed significantly in this case. Don't really know why though :-( As the docs are built just like all the other integrated library docs. -- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail