On 12/10/15 3:07 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
minor comments:
* I see that boost::numeric::safe and std::safe differ on the template parameters.
I'm not seeing this. The boost type signature includes two optional type parameters. So the template signature (excepting namespace) is identical between the std and boost versions. I see why the standard version is not configurable and just
throws. However, I don't see why this doesn't applies to the proposal for Boost.
What is not good for the standard can be good for Boost?
I think I answered this. The standard version is subset of the Boost version. The are compatible - but the boost version has additional functionality which is more cumbersome to implement and requires more investment of effort on the part of the user to understand. std is a subset of the boost one. Robert Ramey