
4 Feb
2005
4 Feb
'05
10:32 a.m.
"Victor A. Wagner Jr." <vawjr@rudbek.com> writes:
ok, let's add one more. Nobody seems to have considered CVSNT It's actively being worked on. Everything that used to work in CVS still does There are new features also that make it attractive (not the least of which is a lock server instead of the lock files) and a (very hopefully soon) fully functional "rename". some enhancements in the handling of merges would be useful to Boost. http://www.cvsnt.com/cvspro/
And despite being called "CVSNT", it still runs fine on Linux servers. My experience with using it has been good. It's certainly a huge improvement over plain CVS. Anthony -- Anthony Williams Software Developer