
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Takatoshi Kondo wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Boost.Graph version 1.53.0. I'm trying to write some graph algorithms and I want to minimize the requirements of the input graph. I have a question about Boost.Graph concepts. I wrote a very simple code as follows:
typedef boost::adjacency_list< boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::bidirectionalS> G;
int main() { G g; boost::add_edge(0, 1, g); auto res = boost::edge(0, 1, g); // Why can I call it? std::cout << std::boolalpha << res.second << std::endl; boost::graph_traits<G>::edge_descriptor e = res.first; std::cout << boost::source(e, g) << "," << boost::target(e, g) << std::endl; }
It works, but I don't understand why I can call boost::edge().
According to the following document, AdjacencyMatrix concept provides Direct Edge Access functionality, so I can call edge(u,v,g) : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/libs/graph/doc/AdjacencyMatrix.html
The class template adjacency_list is a model of VertexAndEdgeListGraph, MutablePropertyGraph, CopyConstructible, Assignable, and Serializable. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/libs/graph/doc/adjacency_list.html
So, adjacency_list is not satisfied AdjacencyMatrix concept.
That's right; it (and a few other graph types) provide edge() but do not satisfy the complexity requirement for it given in the Adjacency Matrix concept.
Also, I found the following document: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/libs/graph/doc/using_adjacency_list.htm... This document describes that: edge() The time complexity for this operation is O(E/V) when the OutEdgeList type is a Sequence and it is O(log(E/V)) when the OutEdgeList type is an AssociativeContainer. It seems that edge() is a part of the public interface of adjacency_list. But I think that it is not a part of any graph concepts.
You are right: the one with that complexity is public but not in a concept officially.
If I want to write an algorithm that depends on several graph concepts, not actual classes such as adjancency_list, I can use edge(u,v,g) only if the input graph class satisfies AdjacencyMatrix concept.
Am I understanding correctly?
Yes. You might want to consider using lookup_edge() from