Here's one man's opinion a) I prefer the larger fonts b) I don't like the detail for each libray. What I would like to see is an expandable index using the control Jonathon Turkanis made so that we would ahve one level visiable: +Any +Array +Date-Time +... c) Boost. before every library is redundant and annoying e) The libraries alphabetically could also have the same +/- expandability. f) It only includes the library generated by ? some procedure which I haven't had the time to figure out yet g)"Documentation for some of the libaries is available in alternative formats..." I thought the whole idea was to be able to make the documents once and have all the other formats generated automatically - So I would expect this sentence to read something like )"Documentation for the above listed libraries is also available in the following alternative formats" h) I never understood why we made a whole new system to do this rather than leveraging on something already developed like LaTex, Troff, or? I'm sure there's a good reason. I would be curious to know what it is Robert Ramey Eric Niebler wrote:
The good folks at boost-docs have been working on improving the look-and-feel of Boost's documentation. This work is based largely on Rene Rivera's website redesign. The change went in to both HEAD and the release branch a few days ago. The biggest change is a smaller font. We've also improved readability by eliminating colored backgrounds, and improved the presentation of many elements of the Doxygen-generated reference sections.
Please take a moment to have a look at the new docs: http://tinyurl.com/4b9gc. Compare to the style of the 1.33.1 docs here: http://tinyurl.com/rujfh.
(I notice that there is some strangeness at the bottom of the libraries.html file the above link takes you to. There should be an alphabetized lists of libraries, and instead there is a fragment of the Boost.Concept_check documentation. That's clearly a bug, but it's not related to the style change.)
Report any problems with the new style to boost-docs@lists.sourceforge.net.
Thanks,