Am 06.10.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Christopher Kormanyos:
A partial implementation of fixed-point in a Boost-like style based on proposal N3352 is now available.
... But your links don't work, I guess you need to > post them directly into the mail. Thanks. I think the docs link is broken.I will look into correcting this with the co-authors. Best regards, Chris
I looked over the pdf Paul Bristow shared, and it looks awesome, though I'd think you'll also need the unsigned variant. I searched for an easy solution for the notation for signed/unsigned and what you can do is use a plain `signed` or `unsigned` as a template parameter, which yields `signed int` and `unsigned int`. That does allow syntax like this: `fixed_point<42, -6, unsigned>(42)` which is quite neat I think. Maybe I missed that, but shift operators would be neat. I.e. "static" shift operators, that is: fp<7, 5> x = 1.0; auto shifted = x >> c<1>; //type = fp<7,4>, but the underlying value is the same. Another thing I worked on, was a literal operator, using the `template<char...> operator"` overload. So you could automatically determine the needed fixed-point type: auto x = 5.25_fp; //yields fp<6,2> I'd have to look how good my code was there, but if you´re interested I could work on that, to integrate it into your library.