From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin@tid.es>
Rob Stewart <stewart <at> sig.com> writes:
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz <joaquin <at> tid.es>
For these reasons, I think allocator_rebind is not an appropriate name. Anyone suggesting a better name than allocator_helper? (Andreas? you wanted to use this stuff)
Why not simply allocator_utilities.hpp?
Yes, sounds good. Same name for the namespace (boost::detail::allocator_utilities)? Isn't it a little long?
Any reason why the ns can't be "allocator?" This code will coexist with any allocator library that may appear, I should think, and these should interoperate with such a library; it might even become part of such a library. I can't see a problem with them sharing a ns. (That also suggests that the directory for the header is boost/allocator/detail.) -- Rob Stewart stewart@sig.com Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;